Kling AI is a popular AI video generator, and it’s undergone some big changes since it was first released. For example, you can use either the earliest Kling 1.0 model, or you can use the more recent Kling 1.5 model.
But how do the two compare? What’s different between them? Which is best for your use cases? If you're unclear about their differences, don't worry! This Kling 1.5 vs. Kling 1.0 guide explains everything you need to know.
TL;DR – The Main Info You Need
If you don’t have time to read the whole Kling 1.5 vs. Kling 1.0 comparison, here’s the main bits of info you need.
The core differences between Kling 1.0 and Kling 1.5 are as follows: Kling 1.5 produces better quality output in general, with more detail and realism, and the end videos have fewer problems like artifacts, blurring, or other obscurities.
1.5 is also a bit better at understanding prompts and handling both text and image to video output, plus it introduced the helpful Motion Brush feature. However, you spend more credits when you use 1.5 to generate videos compared to Kling 1.0.
| Kling 1.0 | Kling 1.5 |
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Quality of Video Output: Kling 1.0 vs. Kling 1.5
Now let’s get into the nitty-gritty of our Kling 1.0 vs. Kling 1.5 comparison, starting with one of the factors that matters the most: the quality of the videos themselves.
Kling 1.0
Quality is not exactly the strong suit of Kling 1.0. It’s a relatively old and outdated tool compared to Kling 1.5, and the kinds of videos that it produces are not necessarily the best quality. They cannot be described as “cinematic” in nature most of the time.
This tool is still capable of making some impressive clips and vids, with the right prompts and configurations. However, a lot of the time, you’ll notice that there are artifacts or blurring or other visual obscurities that detract from the overall impression and engagement levels.
Kling 1.5
Kling 1.5 most definitely cranks the quality levels up a notch when compared directly to Kling 1.0. This is actually one of the big selling points of Kling 1.5 and one of the main benefits that Kling’s own development team cited when it released 1.5.
The videos made by this model tend to be cleaner and crisper, with sharper details, more realistic people and other subjects, and they’re just more engaging on the whole, as well.
Features and Capabilities: Kling 1.0 vs. Kling 1.5
Next, we’ll compare some of the other core features seen in Kling 1.0 and Kling 1.5.
Kling AI's Text to Video
Of the two, Kling 1.5 is simply better at text to video generation. This is thanks to its more advanced technology. It has undergone more extensive training and fine-tuning compared to the original Kling 1.0 model. Because of this, it’s able to create videos that are more in line with the original prompt and of better quality, as well.
| Prompt | Kling 1.5 output video |
| An aerial shot of blue waves crashing against the rocks, creating a grand and majestic scene. |
In contrast, Kling 1.0 is fine with the basics of text to video generation but definitely struggles when you start to use more detailed or complicated prompts. It has a hard time understanding certain requests and conveying them in its output.
| Prompt | Kling 1.0 output video |
| A polar bear plays a small violin in the snow. |
Kling AI's Image to Video
Again, this is something that Kling 1.5 does pretty well. It’s much better overall at using images to make AI videos than Kling 1.0. The output tends to be of a higher quality level overall, and the original image is preserved more fully. The end videos are usually more detailed and have more realistic movement and physics.
| Image input | Kling 1.5 output video |
 |
Kling 1.0 can handle image to video generation as well but sometimes struggles to produce the desired output. It doesn’t always understand the images that it’s working with and can’t always define or clearly see the subjects and objects you want to work with, so the quality of its output suffers.
| Image input | Kling 1.0 output video |
 |
Prompt Adherence
Prompt adherence refers to how well an AI video generator understands and sticks to the prompt that the user entered. Better prompt adherence means that the tool does a smarter job of responding to your prompt and giving you the video you want.
Superior prompt adherence was one of the big selling points that Kling AI highlighted when it launched Kling 1.5. And, in tests, we can see that Kling 1.5 is certainly more intelligent when it comes to understanding and responding to prompts. You can give it the same prompt as Kling 1.0, and it will usually produce a better video.
Meanwhile, prompts sometimes get confused or jumbled up with Kling 1.0. It’s okay for handling basic prompts that aren’t very detailed, but when you start adding in more elements and complexities, like movement or different camera angles, Kling 1.0 starts to show its limitations.
Kling AI's Motion Brush
The release of Kling 1.5 brought with it the release of the Kling Motion Brush. This is a helpful and desired feature in Kling AI video generation that basically lets users “draw” or “paint” onto their images to tell the AI where they want to see motion and in what direction.
Since the 1.5 model of Kling is the smarter and more advanced one of the two, it’s better with the Motion Brush. You can use the Motion Brush and get more accurate and reliable results in Kling 1.5. However, there is a small catch – if you’re using 1.5, you have to pay extra for the Professional Mode to access the Motion Brush.
| Input image with Motion Brush applied | Kling 1.5 output video |
 |
On Kling 1.0, you don't need to pay extra to use the Motion Brush and even free users can give it a try and draw over their images to control the flow of movement of different subjects and elements. However, it doesn’t always work the way you want, as the intelligence of Kling 1.0 isn’t on the same level as the 1.5 or 1.6 versions.
| Input image with Motion Brush applied | Kling 1.0 output video |
 |
Video Output Customization
Both Kling 1.0 and Kling 1.5 let you customize the way your AI videos look. They give you a bunch of controls over things like the duration and aspect ratio for your clips. You can also adjust the creativity of the AI with a slider and control camera movement, or add a “negative prompt” to tell the AI what you don’t want your video to include or look like.
As far as the number and variety of customization options, Kling 1.5 and Kling 1.0 are different. For the image to video feature of Kling 1.5, the Motion Brush and camera controls are available but reserved only for Professional Mode. For text to video, camera controls are not available in Kling 1.5
Kling 1.0 gives you more access to the options and customization features. You can control camera movement in text to video generation and use Motion Brush even in the Standard Mode. But camera controls are not available in Kling 1.5's image to video generation.
For Kling AI's Elements feature, both models offer the same customization capabilities.
Pricing: Kling 1.0 vs. Kling 1.5
Price-wise, Kling 1.0 and Kling 1.5 have a couple of key differences. However, to use either one, you can simply use the Kling free plan, which gives you a small number of credits for making AI videos with whichever model you choose. Alternatively, you can sign up to a premium plan:
- Standard: From $8.80/month or $79.20/year
- Pro: From $32.56/month or $293.04/year
- Premier: From $80.96/month or $728.64/year
The more expensive plans give you more credits to use each month, and you spend credits whenever you make AI videos with any Kling model. However, it costs twice as much to use Kling 1.5 than Kling 1.0, so Kling 1.0 is more appealing to budget users.
Pollo AI: The Ideal Platform to Try Kling AI's Models
Want a more convenient and powerful platform to try these Kling AI models? Try Pollo AI! As an all-in-one AI video generator, you can experience the capabilities of Kling AI's different models. And it lets you access and use a range of other AI video models, including Runway AI, Pika AI, Hailuo AI, Vidu AI, Luma AI, and more.
Pollo AI supports text to video, image to video, and video to video generation. It also offers templates for making different types of AI videos, like special effects videos, AI kiss clips, and AI transformations. It offers AI-powered video enhancements and filters as well, and is free to try.
In Conclusion
So, to conclude our Kling 1.5 vs. Kling 1.0 comparison, we can safely say that Kling 1.5 is better than Kling 1.0 in many key areas. It’s smarter and better at understanding and responding to user prompts, and it produces better quality AI videos. It has fewer issues and is more consistent. But Kling 1.0 has the benefit of being cheaper and offer more customization options.
So, consider these factors to make up your mind when choosing between Kling 1.5 and Kling 1.0, and don’t forget that you can try both models, as well as many more, absolutely free via Pollo AI.